Recommended Books & Periodicals

 

(These sources unless otherwise noted were reviewed by Harry Noyes during his term as conservation chair of Bexar Audubon Society. The opinions are his and do not necessarily reflect the views of other BAS officials, the chapter or the National Audubon Society.)

 

There are thousands of wonderful books and scores of excellent magazines on the environment, ecology and natural history. The following list, reflecting the experience of local environmental activists in keeping themselves informed on these complex issues, includes some of the best of the best.

 

A general tip: even adults may find the best-quality children's books to be valuable sources. Many authoritative adult works are intimidating scientific texts. The kids' books are short, clearly written, and offer the level of depth the average concerned citizen needs. An adult can read 10 of these books in the time it would take to read one typical adult tome, and probably retain more information. One caveat: Some children's authors write on many subjects, are not really experts on them, and make errors. Look for books by professional scientists or science educators.

 

Of course, there are also some handy books aimed at intelligent adult laymen; and we will direct you to some of those here.

 

RECOMMENDED BOOKS:

 

(1) Filters Against Folly: How To Survive Despite Economists, Ecologists and The Merely Eloquent, by Garrett Hardin, Penguin, New York City, 1985 — A brilliantly profound but readable and reasonably short book about the mental errors that crop up in environmental disputes, on both sides. These include the tendency of environmentalists to generalize because they do not recognize the need to quantify problems/solutions in order to choose among them; and the tendency of economists and businessmen to ignore unintended consequences because they don't fit the narrow, short-range forecasting models they use. By normal economic standards, the author reveals, environmental destruction is logical because the future dollar value of an intact forest is less than the profits from investing the proceeds of destruction. The problem, of course, is the unintended consequence: the collapse of the planet will render investment earnings meaningless...but the

economists don't know how to calculate that factor so it gets ignored. Hardin discovered the "tragedy of the commons" – the fact that areas open to the public get abused because the abuser reaps all the benefit and only part of the cost -- and discusses that factor here, too. Conclusion: businesses must be forced to pay for the damage to the commons (air, water, soil, etc.) in proportion to the profits they reap from its use.

 

(2) Takings Law In Plain English, by Christopher J. Duerksen and Richard J. Roddewig, Clarion Associates Inc., Chicago and Denver for American Resources Information Network, 1994 — A brief, lucid guide to what the Constitution and law REALLY say about takings of property and the compensation required. Surprise! It's NOT what the property-rights people want you to believe. The law clearly established (in zoning cases, many years ago, before the environmental movement began) that property owners do not have a right to compensation just because a government regulation limits their use of land. The Constitution requires  compensation only when the owner loses ALL economic use of his property. This invaluable pamphlet is hard to find now, but is worth the effort.

 

(3) Facts About Texas's Birds, Wildlife and Habitat: A Texas Briefing Guide For Policy Makers, by Texas Audubon Society, Austin, 1997 -- A compilation of bullet facts and tabular information from various sources, evidently cobbled together in some haste, and therefore lacking in overview, analysis and perspective, but nevertheless a convenient treasure trove of raw facts about wildlife, their habitats and critical environmental issues such as water, pesticides and public/private lands.

 

(4) Saving Our Ancient Forests, by Seth Zuckerman, and The Rainforest Book, by Lewis Clark, both from The Living Planet Series, Los Angeles, 1991 and 1990 respectively -- Short, easily read books that summarize the value and endangerment of American old-growth forests and tropical jungles respectively, why they matters, and what individuals can do about saving them.

 

(5) The Exploring Earth's Biomes Series, by April Pulley Sayre, 21st Century Books, Division of Henry Holt and Co., various years in the 1990s -- An excellent series of brief, simply written but comprehensive and reliable books, intended for youth but adequate for most adult readers. Biomes covered in separate volumes of less than 100 pages each include (biome name is title of book): Grassland, Wetland, Desert, Lake and Pond, River and Stream, Temperate Deciduous Forest, Tropical Rainforest, Taiga, Tundra.

 

(6) Favorite Wild Animals Of North America, by Rita and William Vandivert, Scholastic Book Service, New York, etc., 1973 – A youth book useful even to adults for basic information and some interesting insights on American wildlife. Fairly easy to find and usually cheap at used-book outlets.

 

(7) ZooBook Series, Wildlife Education Ltd., San Diego -- A long-running series originally sold by subscription, but individual volumes are often available at zoo gift shops and other nature-education outlets or at used-book stores.  Frankly a bit pricey at full cost, especially if you order them all. But the quality is high, with excellent illustrations and insightful information, in a compact 18-page magazine format. Most volumes cover individual species or animal groups. A few address larger conservation and natural-history issues.

 

(8) The Coloring Book Series. Don't let the title fool you. These are serious science books for serious students and adults. This reviewer knows an accomplished neurosurgeon who uses The Human Brain Coloring Book to review neuroanatomy. The basic Biology Coloring Book explains biochemistry and cell structure about as well as it has ever been explained. The authors insist you should actually color the pictures for maximum learning impact, but even if you don't, the words and drawings are outstanding. Besides Biology, there are volumes on Botany, Zoology, Marine Biology and Microbiology, in addition to the several on human anatomy and physiology. Readily available, the series is from Coloring Concepts, Inc., Oakville, Calif.

 

 

RECOMMENDED MAGAZINES:

 

(1) Audubon Magazine -- Not just about birds, this quarterly magazine offers an excellent overview of the full gamut of environmental issues. Top-quality writing and photography. Subscribe by joining National Audubon Society, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003, Tel. 1-800-274-4201 (to maximize benefits to the local community, join through the local chapter, Bexar Audubon Society, P.O. Box 6084, San Antonio, TX  78209; or Tel. (210) 822-4503; or see website at http://www.bexaraudubon.org).

 

(2) The Home Range — The quarterly newsletter of the Predator Conservation Alliance, P.O. Box 6733, Bozeman, MT  59771, Tel. (406) 587-3389, or website http://www.predator conservation.org  Because predators depend on prey and habitat, this publication deals with everything from grass to prairie dogs to forest fires. Unusual insights; enraging reports on the stupidity and cruelty

practiced against American wildlife by government, business and individuals; but also many opportunities to take action.

 

(3) Forest Magazine -- Bimonthly magazine of the Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, P.O. Box 11646, Eugene, OR  97440, Tel. (541) 484-3170, or website http://www.forestmag.org FSEEE was founded by Forest Service employees fed up with the way their own agency all-too-often sold out America's heritage and the American taxpayer for the private profit of robber-baron corporations at the behest of bought-and-paid-for politicians. Because the forest is vital to so much wildlife, this publication covers a wide range of issues. Expect to be shocked by the vile behavior of your own government and certain greedy industries.

 

 

BAD BOOKS

 

Books in this section are not necessarily to be avoided. They may have value, of only as examples of the devious tactics used by promoters of reckless environmental exploitation. But all must be read with great care and are NOT recommended for newcomers to conservation/environmental studies.

 

Facts Not Fear, by Michael Sanera and Jane Shaw. This is a classic example of the principle that the devil is in the details. One has to have some knowledge and pay attention to spot the baloney in this slick anti-environment propaganda piece. Perhaps all one should have to know is that Marilyn Quayle wrote the forward. That ought to be a dead giveaway that this is hard-right propaganda. What makes it interesting to conservationists is the slick methods used... methods we must learn to expose. To start, it commits the same offense it blames us for: peddling fear in lieu of facts (fear that school children are being propagandized by radicals). There is little real information and much of it is false. But not everything in the book is wrong. Environ-mentalists go overboard on occasion (the Alar scare) and sometimes offer oversimplified solutions. One must study the facts and do the math, and our side doesn't always do that. However, neither does the other side. This book purports to be an honest attempt to find a balanced view, but it is not. It is a right-wing polemic (there is much denunciation of government, and private ownership is touted as the solution to every problem from species endanger-ment to water purity, without actually presenting any evidence to prove those claims). This book is crafted to undermine environmental protection, not set it on a firmer basis. Not once does it simply admit that environmentalists are right about anything. Always it claims we are lying, exaggerating or offering the wrong solution. Superficially it admits there are some environmental problems (while insisting right-wing ideas can solve them all). But underneath lies a hidden message: the problems are really trivial and anyone who actually demands that they be fixed is a radical or an idiot. The book doesn't say this but uses propaganda techniques to imply it. Opening chapters describe how dishonest environmentalists are and how we (allegedly) propagandize the nation. Here is found a fiendishly clever but utterly dishonest passage. Environmental groups are described as fabulously wealthy and awesomely powerful lobbyists! The poor corporations, mired in their naive focus on serving customers, are totally helpless against this well-oiled green machine! (I'm not making this up: it actually says this in a section called "Business: Out of Its Element" that says, "they can do little to challenge the apocalyptic claims of environmental activists"! I guess buying the government with campaign donations doesn't count!) The book notes that the 12 most prominent environmental groups have budgets totaling $569.6 million. BUT it does NOT mention that ONE corporation (General Motors) has an advertising budget alone of $2.88 BILLION, more than five times the TOTAL budget of the top 12 enviro groups. So much for honesty and balance. Having created a vision of a rich and traitorous green movement, the book moves on to specific issues. Here it uses what I call the "scare tactics of sarcastic quotation." It says something like "here is what our children are taught" and quotes some textbooks. Almost all the quotations are simple, true statements of basic facts. But by quoting them sarcastically, the book implies that they are false (and thus implies that EVERYTHING said by environmentalists is false). E.g., schools teach that world population is growing too fast and the world can only produce so much food. Both of these are truisms, but this book leaves the casual reader believing they must be false. The only evidence it cites is that population is growing slower than it once did. Of course, this has no bearing whatsover on whether it is growing too fast. Other tactics are to focus heavily on the U.S., which is better off than most of the world, even when discussing issues of global danger (acid rain, climate change). Numbers are cleverly twisted. On forest destruction, the book notes there are more trees in the U.S. now than in 1920. What about 1900, 1850, 1800? You won't find the answers here. Nor will you find any reference to the fact that most of these trees are not in real forests but are in monoculture pine farms owned by paper and timber companies or in abandoned farmland that may take centuries to recover full biodiversity (if the species don't become extinct). I demolished virtually every page of this book with a few simple facts and some basic logic. There is no room for more here: a refutation would be as long as their book, for almost every one of their sentences would require correction. Nevertheless, the book has a certain "know-your-enemy" value for anyone who does care about saving the planet and the species that live there.